LING 390: The Languages of Asia

Information · Coursework · Policies · Schedule

Information

Course description

How widespread is tone among the languages of Asia? How did words such as “ketchup” and “tea” enter English? How have the writing systems of Asia been adapted to write different languages? What are the historical events linking languages such as Uyghur, Tibetan, Persian, Sanskrit, Arabic, Malay, and Chinese? Could large language models save money by “thinking” in Classical Chinese, and does building speech techonologies for Arabic cost more money than English? Where does “Asia” end linguistically, and what do we mean by an “Asian language”?

This course surveys the remarkable diversity of languages in Asia from the Middle East and the Caucasus through Central, South, Southeast, and East Asia to Siberia, examining what they share in common and how they differ. Some of the topics covered include sound systems and tones, writing systems, word formation, sentence structure, language families, language contact and change, language policy, language endangerment, and technologies for Asian languages.

Monday and Wednesday lectures introduce topics in linguistics and examine it across several languages. Friday meetings are devoted to language case studies. Students compile comparative notes on the languages discussed throughout the semester and prepare a detailed profile of one language by the end of the course.

The course provides a foundation for the further study of Asian languages and linguistics and future careers engaging with Asia and speakers of Asian languages. No prior knowledge of linguistics or an Asian language is required.

Learning outcomes

By the end of the course, you will be able to:

  • Locate the major language families, linguistic areas, and language isolates of Asia on a map and explain how linguists establish that languages are related.
  • Describe characteristic sound patterns of Asian languages, including aspiration and phonation contrasts, retroflexion, vowel harmony, syllable structure, and lexical tone, and read basic phonetic transcription.
  • Explain how major writing systems used in Asia represent language, how they spread, and how script choices relate to political and social conditions.
  • Analyze word structure and sentence patterns in unfamiliar language data, including morphological classes, classifiers, case and alignment, word order, topic prominence, and serial verbs.
  • Analyze how honorifics, address terms, sentence-final particles, evidentiality, and cultural keywords express social relationships, speakers’ perspectives, and cultural values.
  • Analyze how standardization, nationalism, migration, and language policy shape the status of languages and dialects, including minoritized and endangered languages.
  • Assess how Asian languages and scripts are represented, and underrepresented, in current language technologies.
  • Research and present a basic linguistic description of a language, support the analysis with scholarly sources, and communicate the findings clearly to a general audience.

Prerequisites

None.

Meeting times and format

This course is taught in person three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

Days Time Location
Monday, Wednesday & Friday 11:00-11:50 AM Herring 125

Instructor

Name Email Office Office hours
Siyu Liang siyu.liang@rice.edu Herring 205 [TBD]

Texts and readings

The course uses readings from several sources rather than a single textbook. All required readings are available at no cost through open-access sources, Fondren Library e-books, or Canvas PDFs. Some of the core texts are listed below. Other articles and book chapters will be posted on Canvas and listed in the schedule.

  • Goddard (2005). The Languages of East and Southeast Asia: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  • Comrie, ed. (2018). The World’s Major Languages, 3rd ed. Routledge.
  • Lyovin, Kessler & Leben (2017). An Introduction to the Languages of the World, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.

Online reference tools

You might use these online tools throughout the course and in your case study:

Acknowledgments

Preparation for this course draws, with gratitude, on materials from Zev Handel’s ASIAN 401 Introduction to Asian Linguistics at the University of Washington.


Coursework

Homework

There will be five problem sets. The lowest homework grade is dropped. All homework is due at 11:59 PM on the listed date.

Language feature profile notebook

Friday meetings are devoted to language case studies. The instructor presents six case studies during the first seven weeks (see the schedule); from March 5 onward, Fridays are reserved for student presentations in a similar format. Case studies share a common feature profile, a checklist of the topics a linguistic description of a language typically covers:

  1. Speakers, geographic distribution, and classification
  2. Phonetics and phonology
  3. Writing systems
  4. Morphology and the lexicon
  5. Syntax
  6. Semantics and pragmatics
  7. Historical development and language contact
  8. Sociolinguistics, language policy, or language technology

The language case study presentation usually touches on most of these topics, but need not cover all of them. Case studies may also emphasize the topics relevant for the week, and students are free to focus on the topics according to their interests and experience.

For each weekly case study, students who are not presenting will prepare a one-page note on the language discussed that week, organized by the feature-profile topics covered, and submit it to the feature-profile notebook on Canvas by the following Monday.

Language case study

The language case study is a group project. Working in groups of three to four, students prepare an oral presentation and a written case study of a language of Asia other than those listed in the schedule. The case study uses the feature profile as its guideline, with detailed analysis of two or three topics and an explanation of their significance for the language. Sources must include at least one reference grammar or grammatical sketch and at least two peer-reviewed articles or book chapters. Group members may also draw on their own knowledge of the language or consult other speakers, with those speakers’ permission.

A list of suggested languages is posted on Canvas. Languages spoken in Houston’s Asian communities are especially encouraged.

Milestone Date Deliverable
Group formation and language choice Jan 29 Canvas form: group members and first and second choice of language; each language is assigned to at most one group
Proposal Feb 10 One page per group: why you chose the language, the two or three profile topics you will examine in detail, three potential sources, and a tentative division of work
Presentation schedule Feb 15  
Annotated source list and profile draft One week before your presentation Drafts of topics 1–3 of the profile and an annotated list of at least five sources
Presentation Mar 5 – Apr 23 (assigned Friday) 15-minute presentation plus 5 minutes of questions, with every group member presenting; slides due by 9 AM on your day
Written profile May 4 Around 3,000 words per group, with a brief statement of each member’s contributions

Case studies are evaluated on the accuracy and depth of the linguistic description, the use of sources, clarity for a non-specialist audience, and connections to themes from the course. All members of a group receive the same grade unless the contribution statements or peer evaluations indicate a substantial imbalance. Presenting groups receive peer feedback, and all students are expected to ask questions on presentation days. Groups that present early are assessed on the topics they selected for detailed analysis and are expected to incorporate material from later units in the written profile.

Grading

Component Weight
Homework (best 4 of 5) 40%
Language case study (proposal 5%, presentation 15%, written profile 25%) 45%
Participation, including feature-profile notebook entries 15%

Letter grades will be assigned using the following scale. Any curve or adjustment will only benefit students.

Grade Percentage Grade Percentage Grade Percentage
A+ 97-100 A 90-96.99    
B+ 87-89.99 B 83-86.99 B- 80-82.99
C+ 77-79.99 C 73-76.99 C- 70-72.99
D+ 67-69.99 D 63-66.99 D- 60-62.99
F Below 60        

Policies

Preparation and participation

Students are expected to prepare for class and participate in collaborative data analysis, listening activities, and discussion. Participation is assessed through in-class activities, feature-profile notebook entries, and engagement on student presentation days. The frequency of spoken contributions alone does not determine the participation grade. If you miss a meeting, review the posted slides and handout and complete the notebook entry before the next class.

Collaboration

Discussing readings and working through homework problems together is encouraged. Unless an assignment says otherwise, the written solutions and analyses you submit must be your own, and you should be able to explain every step. List anyone you worked with and cite any source you consulted. For paired case studies, both partners are responsible for the complete submission and should briefly describe each partner’s contributions.

Late work and extensions

If unexpected circumstances make it difficult to complete work on time, email the instructor as soon as possible to discuss an extension. Without an approved extension or a different policy stated in the assignment, late homework loses 10% of the earned score for each 24-hour period or part thereof, up to 48 hours. Students may exchange presentation dates with a classmate by notifying the instructor in advance.

Use of large language models

AI assistants may be used to review concepts, check transliterations, or identify potential sources. Their output may contain inaccurate linguistic descriptions, fabricated examples, and nonexistent citations, particularly for lesser-studied languages. Claims about a language in submitted work must be supported by sources you have read. You are responsible for the accuracy of your submission.

This course uses the AI Usage Scale (Parsons et al. 2024) to specify permitted forms of AI assistance. Levels 0–2 (grammar and sentence-level editing) are always acceptable; Levels 3–5 (brainstorming, feedback on drafts, paraphrasing for your own understanding) are acceptable with disclosure; Levels 6–8 (structural assistance and substantial generation) are not permitted unless explicitly permitted by the assignment. Using an AI assistant to generate solutions to homework data-analysis problems is not permitted. When you disclose AI use, name the level.

Communication

  • Use the relevant Canvas discussion board for questions about readings, homework, and logistics so that everyone can benefit from the answer.
  • Use email for grades, accommodations, or other private matters.
  • On weekdays, the instructor will normally respond to email within 24–48 hours; responses may take longer on weekends or university holidays. Use office hours or request an appointment for questions that require an extended discussion.

Academic integrity

All work in this course is governed by the Rice Honor System. Academic misconduct includes presenting another person’s work as your own, consulting prior solutions or exams without permission, fabricating data or sources, using unauthorized assistance, or violating an assignment’s collaboration rules. When in doubt about collaboration, citation, or AI assistance, ask before submitting the work.

Accessibility and accommodations

If a documented disability or other condition may affect your academic work, first contact Rice’s Student Disability Resource Center to determine appropriate accommodations, and then meet with the instructor to discuss how they will be implemented in this course. Please do this as early as possible. You are also encouraged to tell the instructor about temporary conditions or other access barriers; if there is something reasonable I can do to make the course more accessible, please let me know.

Several activities involve listening to recordings and reading unfamiliar scripts; each has a transcribed or described equivalent. Please tell the instructor early if listening or visual tasks are difficult for you.

Title IX, support, and mandatory reporting

Rice prohibits harassment, sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking. Under Rice policy, university employees, including the instructor, are Mandatory Reporters and must promptly share information they receive about such conduct involving a Rice student or employee with a Title IX Coordinator. Students seeking support or information about reporting and supportive measures can contact The SAFE Office or review Rice’s reporting options. For an emergency, call 911 or the appropriate campus emergency service.

Religious observances

Please notify the instructor as early as possible if a religious observance conflicts with a class meeting, assignment, presentation, or exam so that a reasonable accommodation can be arranged.


Schedule

Class schedule

The following schedule is subject to change. Readings are to be completed before the associated meeting. Unless otherwise stated, assignments are due at 11:59 PM on the listed date. Readings marked “WML” are chapters of Comrie (ed.), The World’s Major Languages; “LESA” is Goddard, The Languages of East and Southeast Asia; “LKL” is Lyovin, Kessler & Leben, An Introduction to the Languages of the World; “Campbell” is Historical Linguistics, 4th ed. Readings marked [Canvas] are posted as PDFs on Canvas.

Week Date Topic Reading Due
    I. Asia as a linguistic region    
1 Jan 11 What is “Asia,” and what is an “Asian language”? Course overview    
  Jan 13 The language families and isolates of Asia; how genealogical relationships are established; counting languages; online reference tools LESA Ch. 2, §§2.1–2.2
LKL Ch. 1, §1.1: Genetic classification
LKL Ch. 4, §§4.1–4.9 (skim: a family-by-family survey of Asia)
Browse: Glottolog families
HW 1 released
  Jan 15 Case study: Persian WML Ch. 25, “Persian”
Optional: WML Ch. 24, “Iranian Languages”
 
    II. Sounds    
2 Jan 18 No class: Martin Luther King, Jr. Day    
  Jan 20 Sounds I: how speech sounds are made; the IPA; consonant contrasts across Asia LESA Ch. 5, §5.1
Crash Course Linguistics #8 (Consonants) and #9 (Vowels)
Activity: practice with the interactive IPA chart
HW 1 due; Profile entry: Persian
  Jan 22 Case study: Thai WML Ch. 39, “Thai”
Optional: WML Ch. 38, “Tai Languages”
Activity: Thai stops and tones
 
3 Jan 25 Sounds II: vowels and vowel harmony; phonation and register; syllable structure LESA Ch. 5, §§5.2 and 5.4
Optional: Brunelle & Kirby (2016), “Tone and phonation in Southeast Asian languages,” Language and Linguistics Compass 10
Profile entry: Thai
  Jan 27 Sounds III: tone and pitch accent; tonogenesis; tone sandhi LESA Ch. 5, §§5.3 and 5.5
Haudricourt (1954/2018), “The origin of tones in Vietnamese” (trans. Brunelle), focus on the argument
Optional: Yip (2002), Tone, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
HW 2 released
  Jan 29 Case study: Vietnamese WML Ch. 40, “Vietnamese”
Activity: Vietnamese tones
Language choice due
    III. Writing systems    
4 Feb 1 Writing I: what writing is; types of writing systems; the structure of Chinese characters LESA Ch. 6, §§6.1 and 6.3
LKL Ch. 2, §2.1: Typological classification of writing systems
DeFrancis (1984), The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, “The Ideographic Myth”
Optional: Rogers (2005), Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
Profile entry: Vietnamese
  Feb 3 Writing II: Brahmi and the Indic scripts of South and Southeast Asia LESA Ch. 6, §6.2.2 (Thai)
LKL Ch. 2, §2.2: Genetic classification of writing systems
Daniels & Bright (eds.) (1996), The World’s Writing Systems, “Brahmi and Kharoshthi” (Salomon) [Canvas]
Activity: decode a Devanagari, a Thai, and a Tibetan text
HW 2 due
  Feb 5 Case study: Tibetan LKL Ch. 4, §4.11: Sketch of Classical Tibetan (focus on the sections on writing, phonology, and honorifics)
Optional: DeLancey, “Lhasa Tibetan,” in Thurgood & LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. (2017) [Canvas]; Tournadre & Dorje (2003), Manual of Standard Tibetan, Introduction [Canvas]
 
5 Feb 8 Writing III: the spread and adaptation of Chinese characters; kana; Hangul Handel (2019), Sinography, Ch. 1 and the chapter on Japanese
LESA Ch. 6, §§6.2.3 (Korean) and 6.4 (Japanese)
Optional: Taylor & Taylor (2014), Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese, chapter on Hangul [Canvas]
Profile entry: Tibetan
  Feb 10 Writing IV: scripts of the Silk Road; Arabic and Cyrillic scripts in Asia; romanization and script reform LESA Ch. 6, §§6.2.1 (from jawi to rumi) and 6.2.4 (pinyin)
Lewis (1999), The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success, Ch. 3 (the new alphabet) [Canvas]
Daniels & Bright (eds.) (1996), “Aramaic Scripts for Altaic Languages” (Kara) [Canvas]
Optional: Hannas (1997), Asia’s Orthographic Dilemma, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
HW 3 released; Case study proposal due
  Feb 12 No class: Spring Recess    
    IV. Words    
6 Feb 15 Words I: morphemes and morphological types across Asia; morphological analysis LESA Ch. 1, §1.2 and Ch. 3, §3.2
Crash Course Linguistics #2 (Morphology)
Optional: WML Ch. 33, “Arabic” (the morphology section)
Activity: morphological analysis in small groups
Presentation schedule published
  Feb 17 Words II: word formation; loanwords and layered lexicons LESA Ch. 3, §3.1: Loans as indicators of cultural history
Activity: investigate word histories using the OED and etymological dictionaries
HW 3 due
  Feb 19 Case study: Mongolian LKL Ch. 4, §4.1: Altaic area
Janhunen (2012), Mongolian, Ch. 1 (Introduction) and Ch. 2 (Phonology), skim [Canvas]
Optional: Janhunen (ed.) (2003), The Mongolic Languages, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
 
7 Feb 22 Words III: meaning across languages; cultural keywords LESA Ch. 3, §§3.3–3.4
Wierzbicka (1997), Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
Profile entry: Mongolian
    V. Sentences    
  Feb 24 Sentences I: word order and its typological correlates LESA Ch. 1, §§1.1 and 1.3
LKL Ch. 1, §1.2: Typological classification of languages
Dryer, WALS Ch. 81, “Order of Subject, Object and Verb”
Activity: use WALS to examine correlations between word order and other grammatical features
 
  Feb 26 Case study: Uyghur WML Ch. 30, “Turkish and the Turkic Languages” (the introductory section on the Turkic family)
Hahn, “Uyghur,” in Johanson & Csató (eds.), The Turkic Languages (1998) [Canvas]
Dwyer (2005), The Xinjiang Conflict: Uyghur Identity, Language Policy, and Political Discourse, pp. 1–20
 
8 Mar 1 Sentences II: case, agreement, and alignment; Austronesian voice systems LESA Ch. 4, §§4.4.2–4.4.3 (trigger constructions; actor vs. undergoer marking)
Comrie, WALS Ch. 98, “Alignment of Case Marking of Full Noun Phrases”
Optional: Himmelmann (2005), “The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological characteristics,” §§1–3 [Canvas]
Profile entry: Uyghur
  Mar 3 Sentences III: topic prominence; numeral classifiers; serial verb constructions LESA Ch. 4, §§4.1 (classifiers), 4.3 (serial verbs), and 4.4.1 (topic prominence)
Optional: Li & Thompson (1976), “Subject and topic: a new typology of language” [Canvas]
Activity: Thai and Vietnamese classifier and serial-verb problem set
HW 4 released
  Mar 5 Student case studies 1   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
    VI. Meaning and interaction    
9 Mar 8 Interaction I: honorifics and speech levels; pronouns and address terms; sentence-final particles LESA Ch. 1, §§1.8–1.9; Ch. 4, §4.5; Ch. 7, §§7.2–7.3
Optional: Agha (1994), “Honorification,” Annual Review of Anthropology 23, §§1–3 [Canvas]
Activity: Korean and Japanese speech-level matching
 
  Mar 10 Interaction II: evidentiality; communicative styles and cultural scripts LESA Ch. 7, §7.4: Communicative styles
Aikhenvald (2004), Evidentiality, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
Optional: DeLancey (1986), “Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan” [Canvas]; Goddard & Wierzbicka (2004), “Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for?” Intercultural Pragmatics 1
HW 4 due
  Mar 12 Student case studies 2   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
10 Mar 15 No class: Spring Break    
  Mar 17 No class: Spring Break    
  Mar 19 No class: Spring Break    
    VII. Language change and language contact    
11 Mar 22 Change I: sound change, cognates, and the comparative method; reconstruction and cultural history Campbell, Ch. 2, §§2.1–2.5 and Ch. 7, §§7.1–7.3 [Canvas]
Activity: reconstruct a proto-language from Sinitic or Dravidian data
 
  Mar 24 Change II: language families as hypotheses; dating and homelands Campbell, Ch. 9, §§9.1–9.4 [Canvas]
Vovin (2005), “The end of the Altaic controversy,” Central Asiatic Journal 49 (read the introduction and conclusion) [Canvas]
Optional: Robbeets et al. (2021), “Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages,” Nature 599; and the critique by Tian et al. (2022), “Triangulation fails when neither linguistic, genetic, nor archaeological data support the Transeurasian narrative,” bioRxiv
 
  Mar 26 Student case studies 3   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
12 Mar 29 Contact I: borrowing and linguistic areas LESA Ch. 2, §2.3: Mainland Southeast Asia as a linguistic area
Campbell, Ch. 3, §§3.1–3.4 [Canvas]
Emeneau (1956), “India as a linguistic area,” Language 32 [Canvas]
Enfield (2005), “Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia,” Annual Review of Anthropology 34 [Canvas]
HW 5 released
  Mar 31 Change III: semantic change, grammaticalization, and syntactic change Campbell, Ch. 11, §§11.1–11.3 [Canvas]
Optional: Heine & Kuteva (2002), World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, browse entries [Canvas]
 
  Apr 2 Student case studies 4   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
    VIII. Language, society, and nation    
13 Apr 5 Contact II: pidgins, creoles, and mixed languages; Asian Englishes; code-switching LKL Ch. 8, §§8.1, 8.3–8.4: Mixed languages, pidgins, creoles
Optional: Lim & Ansaldo (2016), Languages in Contact, chapter on Asia [Canvas]; Gupta (1994), The Step-Tongue: Children’s English in Singapore, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
HW 5 due
  Apr 7 Language and nation: dialect vs. language; standardization and national languages; diglossia; script politics LESA Ch. 2, §2.4: Language situations
Ferguson (1959), “Diglossia,” Word 15 [Canvas]
Mair (1991), “What is a Chinese ‘dialect/topolect’?” Sino-Platonic Papers 29, §§1–3
Sneddon (2003), The Indonesian Language: Its History and Role in Modern Society, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
Optional: Rahman (2011), From Hindi to Urdu: A Social and Political History, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
 
  Apr 9 Student case studies 5   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
14 Apr 12 Multilingualism, migration, and identity; the Asian languages of Houston Kachru, Kachru & Sridhar (eds.), Language in South Asia (2008), chapter on multilingualism [Canvas]
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, table C16001 (Language Spoken at Home) for Harris County, Texas (browse)
Activity: map Houston’s Asian linguistic landscape
 
  Apr 14 Endangered and minoritized languages: documentation, revitalization, and state policy LKL Ch. 8, §8.6: Language endangerment and renewal
Evans (2010), Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us, Ch. 1 [Canvas]
Optional: Heinrich (2012), The Making of Monolingual Japan, Ch. 1 [Canvas]; Dwyer (2005), The Xinjiang Conflict: Uyghur Identity, Language Policy, and Political Discourse, pp. 1–20
 
  Apr 16 Student case studies 6   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
    IX. Language and technology; synthesis    
15 Apr 19 Language and technology: scripts and Unicode; input methods; tokenization; large language models and low-resource languages Joshi et al. (2020), “The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World,” ACL
Ahia et al. (2023), “Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models,” EMNLP (read §§1–3)
Activity: compare token counts and associated costs across scripts
 
  Apr 21 Synthesis: Asia as a linguistic region    
  Apr 23 Student case studies 7 and course review   Slides due 9 AM (presenters)
Finals May 4 Written case-study profile due   Written profile